|Deletions are marked like this.||Additions are marked like this.|
|Line 19:||Line 19:|
|* [http://www.ccianet.org/modules.php?op=modload&name=News&file=article&sid=634&mode=thread&order=0&thold= CCIA press release]||* [[http://www.ccianet.org/modules.php?op=modload&name=News&file=article&sid=634&mode=thread&order=0&thold=|CCIA press release]]|
|Line 22:||Line 22:|
* 21 September: [:Press_releases/Commission_unable_to_answer_MEPs_on_Patent_Litigation_Agreement:Commission unable to answer MEPs on Patent Litigation Agreement]
* 12 July: [:Press_releases/FFII_statement_given_at_EU_patent_policy_hearing:FFII statement given at EU patent policy hearing]
* 10 July: [:Press_releases/EPO_dogmatic,_short-sighted_and_power-hungry,_says_European_Commission:EPO dogmatic, short-sighted and power-hungry, says European Commission]
* 21 September: [[Press releases/Commission unable to answer MEPs on Patent Litigation Agreement|Commission unable to answer MEPs on Patent Litigation Agreement]]
* 12 July: [[Press releases/FFII statement given at EU patent policy hearing|FFII statement given at EU patent policy hearing]]
* 10 July: [[Press releases/EPO dogmatic, short-sighted and power-hungry, says European Commission|EPO dogmatic, short-sighted and power-hungry, says European Commission]]
|Line 28:||Line 28:|
+32-2-414 84 03 (fixed)[[BR]]
+32-484-56 61 09 (mobile)[[BR]]
bhenrion at ffii.org[[BR]]
+32-2-414 84 03 (fixed)<<BR>>
+32-484-56 61 09 (mobile)<<BR>>
bhenrion at ffii.org<<BR>>
Brussels, 28 September 2006. The US-based Computer & Communications Industry Association (CCIA) sent a letter to all MEPs warning them of the dangers of a new system of patent courts proposed under the European Patent Litigation Agreement (EPLA).
"EPLA's supporters are experts in obtaining patents, not innovation," observed Mark Webbink, Deputy General Counsel for Red Hat, a CCIA member.
"European policy makers are being asked to follow the U.S. model - a specialized patent appeals court - unadvised of the problems the U.S. model has created, especially for producers of software and information technology," warned Ed Black, President and CEO of CCIA.
CCIA has been critical of the US Federal Circuit for making patents easy to get, easy to assert, more potent, and available for any subject matter. It has become virtually impossible for innovators in information technology to avoid inadvertent infringement, while patent litigation has grown astronomically expensive.
While litigation in Europe is generally not as costly as in the United States, EPO figures show that cost would likely grow under EPLA. Webbink warned: "All this is bad news for small firms who already lack the resources to avoid infringement or defend themselves against the rising tide of patent trolls."
Benjamin Henrion of the FFII, reporting from Strasbourg, says: "EPLA is being proposed by patent-expert MEPs and by the Commission as the answer to our patent problems, without full study or explanations. Most MEPs I've talked to have no idea they're being asked to support the creation of a new non-EU institution".
FFII President Pieter Hintjens concludes: "EPLA is a very bad idea: it raises costs for business, it creates a new non-EU institution, it removes the patent system from judicial and legislative control, and it opens the door to a new flood of bad patents, which make money only for patent experts. We do not need new patent courts - we need a better patent office."
- Previous related FFII press releases:
+32-2-414 84 03 (fixed)
+32-484-56 61 09 (mobile)
bhenrion at ffii.org
About the FFII
The FFII is a not-for-profit association registered in twenty European countries, dedicated to the development of information goods for the public benefit, based on copyright, free competition, open standards. More than 850 members, 3,500 companies and 100,000 supporters have entrusted the FFII to act as their voice in public policy questions concerning exclusion rights (intellectual property) in data processing.